Skip to main content

Iron Ore mine turning Roper country red in less than two months

If you've spent any time on the Stuart Highway north of Mataranka in the last couple of months, you've probably passed some distinctive looking road trains carting iron ore towards Darwin. For the past six weeks, they have been steadily coming out of Northern Territory Iron Ore's mine which is part of something called the Roper Valley Iron Ore Project. What travellers on the Stuart Highway won't see is what those trucks are starting to do to country 150km east of the main highway.

I travel along this road - the Roper Highway - usually twice a week. The reddening of the area near the mine is noticeable. A week ago, I stopped to look at just how much dust was coating the roadside vegetation and the pics I tweeted caught the attention of ABC's Country Hour and the Environment Centre NT. 

You can hear me interviewed on NT Country Hour here (my bit starts at 06:00) and also see the resultant online article here

With this activity, I ended up in touch with the EPA's pollution hotline. They recommended getting more evidence of dust pollution so that they may have cause to investigate themselves. So the bulk of this post is my first attempt at providing them with more evidence. (Note: anyone passing through this area, please collect your own evidence. Especially if you find red dust getting into waterways. Notify the NT EPA here - https://nt.gov.au/environment/environment-protection-recycling-waste/report-pollution)

"Control" Sample

The first thing I did was some quick documentation at a site about 15km east of the mine turn-off (about 1km east of the Badawarrka turn-off). These images should show what dust impacts look like without the effects of iron-ore trucks going past: a "control" sample. Same road, same traffic minus the iron ore road trains. I also made sure I chose a section of country where the soil is quite red so that the dust would be noticeable on vegetation, like it is further down the highway. 

Lat: 14° 42’ 7.398” S, Long: 134° 26’ 58.89” E

Here's the dust on vegetation right on the verge of the road. You can see there is a light covering of dust on it:



I also made sure to check on impacts further in from the road, so I also walked a few metres (10m?) and checked for dust there. There, I couldn't really detect any dust:

"Proximal" Sample

The next evidence I got was very close to where iron ore road trains turn onto the Roper Highway.  This is where any impacts of dust pollution caused by road trains should be most apparent.


To the naked eye, you can see how red the roadside vegetation looks:

Lat: 14° 43’ 35.862” S, Long: 134° 16’ 18.33” E

A closer look and the dust covering plants on the verge is thick:


It wasn't particularly easy to reveal the green of the leaf underneath the dust:


An image showing the contrast after I (tried to) dust off a leaf:


I then repeated what I'd done at the 'control' site and walked several metres in from the verge. At the control site, I couldn't really detect dust on the leaves. Here, however, there was still obvious dust on vegetation though not the thick coating found on the verge:


The visible contrast after cleaning dust off a leaf (about 10m in from the road):


As a final sample from this site, I walked further off the road, perhaps a good 30-40m in. 

There, leaves barely showed visible dust but you can notice traces:


"Distal" Sample

The third thing I did was to stop again another 5mins (about 8km?) down the road to see what the dust impacts look like at some distance from the mine site, where we can assume the road trains have less dust to disperse. (The GPS location for this site is: Latitude: 14° 44’ 56.358” S, Longitude: 134° 13’ 44.85” E).

Again, vegetation on the verge, had quick a thick covering of dust - certainly more than at the control site:




As with the other site, I also checked dust levels about 10m in from the verge:


Again, unlike the first (control) site where there really was no detectable dust, here, there was a light but definitely visible coating. You can see a contrast between the leaf I cleaned with my finger and the leaf below it that is as-I-found-it:

Just the beginning

A reminder: this is just the beginning of this story. Firstly, the iron ore trucks have only been running for around six weeks. Secondly, the mine isn't even operational. The ore being transported is apparently only the stockpile left over from the failed previous operators of the mine, Sherwin Iron. Yet the dust pollution is already obvious.

If/when the mine does start operation, the volume of ore being transported will increase and over time the dust pollution will increase and its effects compound. The evidence I'm sharing here is really just a red flag of what is likely to come. 

Other issues with the mine

While this post is specifically to document the start of dust pollution created by the NTIO operation, it is not the only issue I am aware of with this mine.

What does NTIO have approval for?

As you can hear in the interview I did with ABC, there was a point of confusion: the mine where this ore and trucks are coming from is (I learned after tweeting pics of the dust-coated plants) not yet through its environmental approval process. A staff member at the EPA told me "they shouldn't be doing anything", but then it seems the iron being transported at the moment is from a stockpile from the previous failed operators, Sherwin, and so approvals to move it relates to Sherwin's pre-existing approvals.

But those approvals are apparently with Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade (not with the EPA) and I'm not sure how to access them. Note that neither Sherwin's old operations or the present NTIO operations have a publicly available Mining Management Plan on the NT Government site: https://industry.nt.gov.au/publications/mining-and-energy/public-environmental-reports/mining/public-mining-environmental-reports/mines 

No approval to recommence operations

NTIO doesn't have approval to restart operations. The advice I received from the EPA seems to say that not only does NTIO need to go through its own Environment Impact approval process, it sounds like they've been too slow and need to start again. That's my take anyway. This is what I was emailed:

The NT EPA required a new EIS to cover the new activities. The assessment process was started in 2017 but only limited steps were taken. The NT EPA is in consultation with the new owners of the mine about terminating the assessment process due to the amount of time that has lapsed since the process started. A new referral to the NT EPA would be required if the activities are proposed in future.

No communication in or benefit to Ngukurr


I work in Ngukurr which is the largest community in the vicinity of the mine, just 60km to the east. With 1,000 residents and low employment and a small economy, Ngukurr is exactly the sort of place that should reap the benefits of having mining activity so close. 

As far as I know, no one has been told a thing about this mine in Ngukurr and no moves by the mine's owners have been made to set up anything in Ngukurr - employment, training, community benefit scheme, nothing. Ngukurr residents are required to share the highway with these trucks and watch as nearby country gets destroyed for nil benefit.

This is why I become cynical when I hear governments and politicians tell us how mines bring jobs and benefit the economy, because I don't see any evidence of benefits now or in the near future coming to Ngukurr.

Traffic issues


The road trains do more than create dust pollution. They are a hazard to other users of the Roper Highway, which includes many residents of the remote communities of Ngukurr, Numbulwar, Urapunga, Minyerri and Jilkminggan. The Roper Highway is largely a single-lane highway with a number of narrow bridges. 

"The single-lane Territory highway has been put under intense pressure by three mining projects" (NT News, 11/9/13)

The area recently had unseasonal wet weather in June and along the highway you can still see numerous spots where smaller vehicles were forced on to soggy dirt to make way for road trains, leaving deep tyre tracks in the road shoulders.

Who even owns the mine? (And how does anyone contact them?)


Another thing that isn't quite clear to me is who is in charge. The sign near the mine says it's NTIO (Northern Territory Iron Ore) and they still have a website that says it's their mine. When you contact NTIO via their website, the reply comes from Hoa Phat - a Vietnamese steel company. The recent ABC story says Hoa Phat bought the mine last year. Assuming they are now the owners, it still seems unclear and no-one at ABC was able to speak to anyone from the company for their story. (If ABC can't get a hold of anyone from the company, it doesn't give me confidence that anyone from Ngukurr would be able to either).

Still trying to suss out if the mine operated by NTIO or Hoa Phat


It's not the only mine in the area


There is another iron ore mine in the vicinity, currently operated by Nathan River Resources (formerly run by Western Desert Resources). Its activities are far more out of sight to Ngukurr residents so it's hard to see any impacts, although iron ore dust pollution has historically been a problem with that mine too, as reported in this 2014 ABC article. More recently, Nathan River Resources were taken to court by the NT Government, for allegedly illegally discharging toxic waste water into the Towns River

Then to the immediate west of the NTIO/Hoa Phat mine is an ilmenite mining operation, run by Australian Ilmenite Resources (AIR). They were in the news in late 2021/early 2022 after strong community concerns were voiced about an application for a licence to take 3.3 billion litres of water out of the Roper River. That license application is still with the water controller. 

As with NTIO/Hoa Phat, none of these mines have publicly available Mining Management Plans listed on the NT Government website, nor do they have any meaningful communication with the Ngukurr community (if any at all). Collectively, these three mines paint a picture of activity that threatens the local environment and does nothing for local Indigenous communities. 

And that's my story (for now), about what I'm seeing with the old-Sherwin-then-NTIO-now-Hoa-Phat iron ore mine near Ngukurr. The main reason I put this post together is to document the emerging dust pollution issue to forward on to the EPA Pollution Hotline, but I hope it's been of interest of others. Please add further comments if you have more info and if you have any other documentation of pollution please share!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A conference, language policy and Aboriginal languages in Federal Parliament

The other day, I was priveleged in attending a TESOL symposium about 'Keeping Language Diversity Alive'. One of the speakers, Joseph Lo Bianco was excellent and discussed Language Policy. He gave a handout at one of his sessions that I'm going to type out in full here, because it was a real eye-opener. It's from the Official Hansard of the Federal Parliament from a debate that happened on 10/12/98. Here's how it went: Mr SNOWDON: My question is to the Prime Minister. Is the Prime Minister aware of the decision by the Northern Territory government to phase out bilingual education in Aboriginal schools? Is the Prime Minister also aware that his government funds bilingual education programs in Papua New Guinea and Vietnam? Prime Minister, given that article 26(3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children, will you take a direct approach to the Norther

The pitiful state of Recommendation 11.6 of the NT Fracking (Pepper) Inquiry

Today the NT Government announced that it's ok to start fracking the Beetaloo Basin, claiming that all 135 recommendations from the 2018 Pepper Inquiry report have been met and, therefore, fracking can proceed.  Most of the recommendations - and you can go through them all here:  Action items | Hydraulic Fracturing in the Northern Territory  - are outside my field of expertise as a linguist. There's a lot of regulatory stuff, things about the mining industry, stuff about land and water management that others know much more about than me.  However, as a linguist working in the Katherine Region for 20 years, there is one recommendation that sits in my wheelhouse so, after today's announcement, I wanted to take a look at it. It's Recommendation 11.6, which says: That in collaboration with the Government, Land Councils and AAPA, an independent, third-party designs and implements an information program to ensure that reliable, accessible, trusted and accurate information ab

Subtle features of Aboriginal English that I love: agreeing or confirming by copying

Linguists aren't supposed to play favourites, but I love Aboriginal English. Maybe because it's what the love of my life speaks and separating language from people and society isn't a realistic prospect. I'm lucky to regularly be around Aboriginal people speaking English in all sorts of ways and privileged to have insights into some of the more subtle ways in which Aboriginal ways of using English differ from the suburban white English I grew up speaking.  I want to share some of these more subtle features. Not just because I am fond of them but also because they seem to be features that escape the attention of most academic discussions of Aboriginal English / Aboriginal ways of using English. I'm going to skip over the complexities of what Aboriginal English is (and isn't) and also if/why that label is worth using at all (a chapter I wrote on Aboriginal English(es) dips into some of that discussion - email me if you want a copy). For brevity's sake, let